John Fiske Brown Associates, Inc.

Home Our Staff Client Tools Available Resources Staff Member Articles Links Contact Us
       Forensic Engineering, 
  Science and Technology



                                   Staff Member Articles


The following sample articles were written and published by staff members to help educate new and current clients alike. Choose from the list of the following articles and be sure to check back periodically for newly added articles.

Article 1: Did The Brakes Really Fail?  Did The Brakes Really Fail?  by Eric Shapiro,A.S.E.
Article 2:
Film is Cheap. Claims can be Expensive!  by Jack C. Debes, Ph.D.
Article 3:
Accident Reconstruction Primer for Attorneys. by Kenneth S. Obenski, P.E. & Jack C. Debes, Ph.D.
         Article 3 Subsection: Accident Reconstruction Definitions
Article 4: Forensic Implications of Asphyxia.
by Lori L. Wickham, Ph.D.
More Articles: The Forensic Consultants Association has additional interesting articles for your review.


Article 1:

Eric Shapiro is an associate of John Fiske Brown Associates, Inc. and a member of the San Diego Forensic Consultants Association. He has greater than 23 years experience related to automobiles.

DID THE BRAKES REALLY FAIL?

By Eric Shapiro, A.S.E.

A driver is full of information regarding his vehicle’s performance. For example, a driver collided into a concrete freeway bridge and was severely injured. Upon interview he stated that the brakes failed. What does that mean? From the driver’s perspective, we can certainly agree that the brakes indeed failed. Perhaps not in a mechanical sense, rather that they failed to provide the expected results. Face it, if brakes weren’t completely predictable we’d all start riding horses again, for safety’s sake! So it’s really the expected results that are in question. Therefore, it must be asked whether or not the driver had a right to expect a safe stop in the above situation. The only way to determine that is by examining the vehicle’s braking system to see if it was functioning properly.

In a perfect world, the vehicle would be in "as manufactured" condition in all cases and we could simply blame the driver for the collision. Not necessarily. Numerous vehicles suffer from design or manufacturing defects right off the assembly line. Scroll through a list of your favorite car’s TSB’s (Technical Service Bulletins) and you’ll see what I mean. Vehicle manufacturers issue these notifications to service personnel when problems exist. Manufacturers are well-meaning, but even a car in good condition can be the cause of an accident because of production or design deficiencies. A few examples are:

Brakes disengaged because of ABS electrical transient;

Throttle locked wide open by defective cruise control;

Brake cylinders damaged by captive grit.

Alternatively, the accident may have been caused by maintenance deficiencies. Manufacturers provide maintenance schedules to the vehicle as a guideline based on automobile needs. Beyond that, the maker has little control over the vehicle’s owner and what he does to keep up with vehicle maintenance. There are certainly under-maintained vehicles. And there is a subset of those vehicles where maintenance issues were the cause of an accident. For instance, in our office we’ve seen:

Brake fluid that boiled because of water content

Hydraulic tubes that failed;

Tires that rubbed through brake hoses (due to poor routing).

Many poorly maintained or improperly repaired cars have zipped past you on the freeway. But even if the car was repaired by a qualified mechanic mistakes are made. Fortunately some form of guarantee usually covers those mistakes. That’s why we appreciate warranties so much. It allows us recourse when flaws in design, manufacturing or repair are made to a vehicle. Hopefully, this occurs before anyone is harmed.

In a case of claimed brake failure, the investigator starts by depressing the brake pedal. Is it firm or spongy? This is then followed by checking the brake fluid for contamination. Does it appear amber as fresh fluid would? Or is it dark, indicating suspended contaminants and possibly water? In order to determine if the brakes functioned adequately, the following systems must be examined thoroughly: brake hydraulic system, service brake mechanisms and any associated electronics. If the brake system is discovered to be intact and adequately maintained, then the design itself must be critically examined. Only after this is done, can we decide if the source of failure was man or machine.

Top of Page

 

 

Article 2:

FILM IS CHEAP. CLAIMS CAN BE EXPENSIVE!

by Jack C. Debes, Ph.D.

As an injury biomechanics and accident reconstruction specialist, I often find myself struggling to put together a forensic puzzle with a few too many pieces missing. One way that insurance claims inspectors can help the forensic expert is to take plenty of photographs of property damage. When it comes to reconstructing an auto accident, the next best thing to having been there is having good photographic evidence. This is especially true when there is a possibility of a personal injury claim. One of the best ways for the biomechanics expert to determine if the forces of the collision caused injury is to quantify the "crush" damage to the vehicle. The best way to do this is to take direct measurements of the vehicle in its damaged state. Second to this, high quality photos of the damage can allow the reconstructionist to quantify the amount of energy of the collision. At less than $7 for a roll of film, and even less for digital photos, skimping on photography is like stepping over dollars to pick up pennies.

Here are a few tips for taking photos of vehicular property damage:

The "Big Eight": Take photos of all four sides and all four corners of the vehicle. Even parts of the vehicle that appear to be undamaged can be important.

Photograph the damaged area from at least three different angles.

Take photos of the damaged regions with and without a measuring stick in view. Make sure that your measuring stick has graduations (of feet and inches) that can be clearly read in the photos.

Bring a step-ladder along. Get up on the ladder and take some shots looking straight down on the damage (with your measuring stick in view) so that the depth of the dent(s) may be measured.

Use the "landscape" view only (except in rare cases where damage can only be viewed using the "portrait" view). This makes it easier to view photos when they are placed in an album.

Be sure to take a photo of each of the following:

a. The license plate.

b. The VIN number (on the dashboard).

c. The vehicle identification tag (on the driver’s side door).

d. The odometer reading.

Carry a disposable camera in every car you drive. Tell your friends and colleagues to do this too. If you are involved in an accident take as many photos as you can at the scene. Be sure to get photos of all the vehicles involved. If possible, without putting yourself in danger, get some shots of the vehicles in the positions where they came to rest (before they are moved). Also, try to get some photos of any skid marks that you can see.

Be sure not to get in the way of any emergency or law enforcement personnel and don’t put yourself or others in harm’s way!

 

Top of Page

 

 

Article 3:

Accident Reconstruction Primer for Attorneys

by Jack Debes, Ph.D. and Ken Obenski, P.E.

 Underlying Science

 Accident Reconstruction (AR) is based on the laws of Newtonian physics.  Although many of us may have a tough time remembering these laws from our high school physics class, we live in a world that is governed by these principles so that even if we don’t remember the laws by name, we actually have an intuitive feel for them.

  Newton’s First Law states that a body in motion remains in motion unless acted upon by some outside force and a body at rest remains at rest unless acted upon by some outside force.  Mathematically, the First Law states that if the sum of all forces on a body is equal to zero, its velocity is constant.  In AR this means that if a driver maintains a constant speed while traveling on a level road in a given direction, the vehicle will continue at that speed and direction unless the driver brakes, accelerates, turns, crashes into another object, or the vehicle stops due to fuel consumption or mechanical failure.

Newton’s Second Law states that Force equals Mass times Acceleration (F=ma).  In AR, acceleration is a measure of the rate of change of speed of the car.  If it speeds up, the acceleration is positive, if it slows down (decelerates) the acceleration is negative.  The force required to accelerate the car is equal to the mass of the car times the acceleration.  This force, which is called the inertial force, is what you feel when your body is pressed into the seat back when you put the pedal to the metal; likewise it is the force that causes your briefcase to fly forward off of the seat and onto the floor when you slam on the brakes.  When two vehicles collide, each vehicle experiences a sudden change in speed called acceleration (or deceleration).  This change in speed is known as  Delta-V or ΔV.  The change of speed divided by the time of the collision is equal to the acceleration (ΔV/Δt=a).  And since Force is equal to Mass times Acceleration (F=ma), ΔV is related to the force of the collision by the following relation:

F = m a = m (ΔV/ Δt)

 Or solving for the same equation for ΔV, one can write:

ΔV=(F Δt)/m

In auto collisions, the time the vehicles are in contact and transferring momentum (Δt) may vary, but typically it is about 1/10 second.  Therefore, ΔV is generally a good measure of the acceleration (a) and ultimately the force (F) of the collision.  Since force is what damages vehicles and injures occupants, ΔV is generally a good way to quantify the severity of a collision.

Newton’s Third Law states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.  While this principal may also apply to human behavior, in physics it means that if I lean against the wall with a certain amount of force, the wall pushes back against me with an equal and opposite force.  In an auto collision the impacting car is referred to as the bullet vehicle, whereas the impacted car is called the target vehicle.  In an auto collision, the force that the bullet car applies to the target car is equally opposed by the target car pushing back on the bullet car.

Application of Principles

 Accident Reconstruction is based on the accurate science of Newtonian physics. Unfortunately a scientific answer can be no more precise than the worst input data, and input data is often assumed, guessed, estimated or crudely measured. 

One area that is confusing is units of measure.  Usually in America speed S is expressed in miles per hour (mph) and velocity V in feet per second (fps), but the terms may be used indiscriminately. In physics V represents a vector, which defines both speed and direction.  However, in AR the term V is often used for speed only with no direction specified.

A vehicle can leave tire marks in at least three different ways: 

 1.      Acceleration Skid (“burn-out”)

2.      Braking Skid

3.      Centrifugal Skid (Yaw Mark)

Burn-outs tend to start out dark and then get lighter as the vehicle gains traction.  Generally, speed cannot be determined from burn-out marks.  Burn-out skids can be curved or straight, and usually involve only one or two tires (the drive wheels).  Braking skids on the other hand start out light and get darker as the skid progresses, since the tire is heating up during the skid and laying down progressively more rubber until the vehicle comes to rest.  Braking skids can involve from one to four tires (on a 4 –wheeled vehicle) and they are generally linear.  Centrifugal skids occur during turning and are therefore curved. 

 The most basic technique for estimating vehicle speed is by measuring the length of braking skid marks. The pre-skid speed (mph) is estimated by first multiplying: 30 times the distance the vehicle skidded before stopping without impact times the drag factor; and then taking the square root.

                  

  30 is a derived mathematical constant. The distance a vehicle skidded should be straightforward. It is simply the length of the longest skid in most cases. If any other value is used, the reconstructionist should explain why. Drag factor goes by many names, including mu, m, F, C.O.F. (Coefficient Of Friction). It is nearly impossible to know the exact drag factor for a given accident because there are too many variables that determine it.  If the same vehicle can be skid tested at the same location this will yield the best available estimate. Tests of other vehicles or other locations may be meaningful or worthless depending on how the test is done.  Fortunately, because the answer is based on the square root, small errors in drag factor will be insignificant.  The weight of the vehicle is not needed.

If there are multiple overlapping skids, it is necessary to inquire how the skid distance was determined. There are many possibilities, but it is almost never valid to add skid lengths together, or to take an average.

 Often the vehicle does not stop in one continuous skid. The vehicle behavior must be broken down into separate regimes, then the speeds added together by taking the square root of the sum of the squares.


There are different but perfectly valid ways to rearrange the same mathematics so it need not look exactly as it does here.  It is seldom valid to simply add the individual speed estimates together, because the sum is the sum of the energies, and energy is ½ times mass times velocity squared (1/2 mv2).  Mass is an unfamiliar term to most people, but it is intuitively similar to weight.  Weight is gravity dependent, mass is not.  Your weight on the Moon will be less than your weight on Earth.   Mass (measured in Slugs) times 32.2 equals weight (in pounds) if you are on Earth.  We have not had an AR case on the Moon yet!

 Another more controversial method for estimating vehicle speed is the critical speed for a curve based on centrifugal skids or yaw marks. 

        

 This calculation is often used incorrectly. It can only be valid if the vehicle is in a steady state condition, not out of control.  Non-concentric yaw marks imply the vehicle is going out of control.  At least three tires must leave marks that are concentric and circular; otherwise the estimate must be adjusted for these non-standard conditions.  Valid application of the calculation technique requires that the vehicle travel at a nearly constant speed through the maneuver.  This will be evidenced by tire marks called striations that are radial (i.e. perpendicular or nearly perpendicular to the direction of travel indicated by the tire marks). Critical speed cannot be added to speed calculated by other methods (such as speed from braking skids).  It stands alone as the speed of the vehicle at the time when the concentric tire marks were made.

 One of the most difficult techniques for estimating speed is speed from crush damage.  The data are seldom adequate and the formulae alone take up most of a page.  The range of possible speeds for an impact with a fixed object varies widely among vehicles. However, assuming the vehicle is stopped by the impact, impact speed (mph) is generally in the range of one to 1 ½ mph times the deepest crush measured in inches plus the speed that the vehicle will tolerate without being damaged.

Impact Speed (mph) ≈ [(1 to 1.5) x Crush (in.)] + No Damage Speed (mph)

 In a front or rear impact involving the bumper, bumper ratings can be useful in estimating the no-damage speed.  Speed calculated from crush may be expressed as closing speed, barrier equivalent speed, kinetic energy speed, crash speed, delta-V, DV etc. These terms are not interchangeable, although in certain situations some of these values can be equal.

 Momentum analysis can often lead to more accurate estimation of the speed when two or more vehicles are involved.  The speeds after a collision can be estimated using the methods shown above (i.e. skid distances and speed addition).  The pre-collision speeds can be determined from basic Newtonian conservation of momentum.  Mass before collision times velocity before collision equals mass after collision times velocity after collision.

M1b•V1b + M2b•V2b = M1a•V1a + M2a•V2a

This can be simple if the collision is in line, or very complicated if there is travel in different directions before or after the collision. It will be complicated if there are more than two objects involved, such as a motorcycle with people that fly off in different directions.  This requires knowledge of the mass (or weight) of each involved object, as well as estimates of the drag factor, distance and direction for each post-collision movement plus an estimate of the pre-collision direction of each object. The analysis can be done with massive vector equations that can be very precise but prone to horrible error. Alternatively, graphical techniques can be used which are easier to understand, but less precise.

 This document is a brief description of the principles of vehicular Accident Reconstruction (AR).  The information described herein should be adequate for attorneys, insurance adjusters, or medical professionals to gain a basic understanding of the concepts and vernacular of the art and science of AR without having to become an expert in the field themselves.  Modern technology (e.g., Total Stations, Computer Simulation Software) developed for AR data collection, analysis and presentation can simplify the process of AR and provide impressive graphics.  However, the validity of the analysis can only be as accurate as the raw data collected.  There is no substitute for high quality photographs and accurate direct inspections of vehicles and accident scenes.

Acknowledgement

The contributions of our colleagues L.L. Wickham, Ph.D., E.S. Shapiro, A.S.E. and Lynda Laws are gratefully acknowledged.

 

Accident Reconstruction Definitions

 

ABS (antilock braking system): Computer intervention to interrupt skidding momentarily for improved control simultaneous with maximum brake performance.

Acceleration: Rate of change in velocity with respect to time.

Acceleration Skid: Tire mark left due to hard acceleration, “burn-out” (informal).

Accident Reconstruction: The art and science of using engineering principals to determine what really happened in an anomalous event.

Accident: An unintended event with a negative outcome.

Backlite:  The rear-facing window of a car, sometimes called the rear windshield.

Baker, J. Stannard: The pioneer of accident reconstruction.

Barrier Equivalent Speed: The speed at which the same vehicle would have to hit a fixed rigid barrier to sustain the same magnitude of damage.

Bead: The reinforced part of a tire that engages the rim.

Biomechanics: The application of engineering mechanics to a biological system, especially the human body.

Bobtail: A short truck without a trailer, specifically a truck tractor with no trailer.

Braking Skid:  Tire mark left due to hard braking.

Cab: The driver's compartment of a truck, not an entire vehicle (see tractor).

Closing Speed: The speed of one vehicle relative to another without regard to actual speed relative to the ground.

Crash Speed: An ambiguous term to be avoided.

Centrifugal Force:  Radial force acting on a vehicle while turning or negotiating a curve.

Centrifugal Skids:  Tire marks left from a vehicle turning at critical speed (see Yaw Marks).

Critical Speed: Speed at which the centrifugal force of a vehicle negotiating a curve exceeds the traction force of the tires on the road.

Crush:  Permanent damage or deformation sustained by a vehicle as a result of impact.

Deceleration: Negative acceleration.

Delta:  Δ (Greek), Difference or change.

Delta-V: (ΔV) Change in velocity, may be cited in miles per hour (mph) or feet per second (fps).

Duals: Two tires at one wheel position.

Eighteen-wheeler: A maximum legal size truck, usually having 18 tires on 5 axles.

g: Universal gravitational constant; for Earth, 32.2 feet per second per second.

GAWR: Gross axle weight rating, the maximum total weight to be applied to the ground by that axle.

GVWR: Gross vehicle weight rating, the maximum total weight the vehicle is designed to apply to the ground.

Human Factors: The study of the interaction of humans with their working environment.

Hydraulic: Using moving fluid (liquid) that is pressurized to do work.

Hydroplane: To be supported by the surface of water by traveling at high speed.

Impact Speed: Closing speed at impact (see closing speed).

Lay it down: To deliberately cause a moving motorcycle to be upset onto its side.

OEM: Original Equipment Manufacturer.

Momentum:  Mass or weight times velocity or speed.

Pressure: Force distributed over area.

Prolongation of a line: Poorly defined term used in traffic accident reports.  It may be the true prolongation, a perpendicular offset to a point of tangency, or a figment of someone’s imagination.

Quarter Panel: The sheet metal surrounding the rear wheel area of a car or pickup.

Tractor: A truck built specially to pull a semi-trailer.

Turning Circle: Diameter of the minimum circle within which a vehicle can physically fit during a turn (a design specification).

V: Generally designates Velocity.

Vector: A mathematical quantity having both a magnitude and direction.

Velocity: Speed in a specified direction.  In accident reconstruction velocity is usually expressed in feet per second and speed in miles per hour.  Speed, if expressed in feet per second, may be called (incorrectly) velocity.

Yaw mark: Tire mark made by a tire that is side-slipping during a high-speed turn (see Centrifugal Skids and Critical Speed).

 

Top of Page

 

 

Article 4:

Forensic Implications of Asphyxia

By Lori L. Wickham, Ph.D.

If you were to dive into a pool and hold your breath, how long could you spend underwater? Probably less than a minute unless you are David Blaine, an Ama Pearl Diver, or conditioned to lower your metabolic rate like a meditating Yogi.  However, with practice, many people can hold their breath for about two minutes.
What do breath-hold diving, suffocation, strangulation, and drowning have in common?  They all involve progressive asphyxia, concomitant low oxygen [hypoxia], high carbon dioxide [hypercapnia] and acidosis.  The latter is a result of the buildup of lactic acid, a by-product of anaerobic metabolism [without oxygen].  Most of us are familiar with the feeling of pain of lactic acidosis after a demanding workout.  Asphyxia can be limited to a regional tissue deprived of blood [e.g. ischemia] or manifest as blocked respiration in the body as a whole.  

There is a hierarchy within the body in terms of how long different tissues can withstand this deprivation.  In many cases, human extremities can be deprived of blood for more than 30 minutes without damage while the central nervous system, specifically those portions involved in consciousness, will not continue to function for more than a few seconds without oxygen. The disruption of cell metabolism in the tissues and the accumulation of toxic by-products result in patho-physiological consequences such as tissue necrosis, loss of consciousness and death.  Forensic interest may then become a question of causation and how long the asphyxia lasted before death occurred. The latter may be important in cases where family members witnessed the suffering of the decedent.

Lack of oxygen, either partial [hypoxia] or total [anoxia] causes death. Normal room air is approximately 21% oxygen.  Impairment of cognitive and motor function can manifest at oxygen concentrations of 10-15%, loss of consciousness at less than 10%, while death usually occurs at less than 8%.  For example, although hypoxic endurance varies, a person can lose consciousness in 40 seconds and die within a few minutes at ambient oxygen levels as low as  4-6%.

Asphyxial deaths, whether accidental, suicidal or homicidal are grouped by forensic scientists into three generalized categories: Strangulation, Chemical Asphyxia and Suffocation. Most reported murders by asphyxia involve strangulation. An inhaled substance interfering with the body’s ability to use oxygen [e.g. carbon monoxide, butane, and nitrous oxide] characterizes chemical asphyxia. Carbon monoxide blocks the active binding site of hemoglobin [Hb] the protein that carries oxygen in red blood cells. ‘Simple’ asphyxia is another term for oxygen displacement by another gas. When water or another liquid fills the lungs causing asphyxia this is called drowning. There are several variations such as near-drowning, secondary drowning and immersion syndrome. Autoerotic or ‘sexual asphyxia’ by self-strangulation, drowning, choking, and a variety of other means is increasingly reported, especially by the media.

Deaths due to suffocation are often subdivided further, by causation, into those due to entrapment or environmental suffocation, smothering, choking, mechanical asphyxia, mechanical asphyxia combined with smothering and suffocating gases.   Entrapment involves individuals trapped in air-tight enclosures [e.g.  children trapped in abandoned refrigerators].    Environmental suffocation usually involves someone accidentally entering an area depleted of oxygen by a mechanism other than gaseous suffocation.   For example, inhaled fluid displaces air during drowning. Fungal infestations in enclosed areas can also cause lethal oxygen reduction. Smotherings by mechanical obstruction of the nose and mouth are rarely accidental.  However, examples are an alcoholic stupor leading to loss of consciousness and subsequent face compression on pillows or bedclothes and defective cribs with gaps that might impair infant mobility after laying face down.   Criminals also sometimes inadvertently asphyxiate a victim with gags in the mouth or around the face. Choking asphyxia can be homicidal, accidental or even a "natural" result of inflammation of the soft mucosal tissues of the respiratory tract. Some find it surprising that steam inhalation can result in swelling to the point of obstruction in some reactive individuals.  Most reported choking deaths are accidental and involve obstruction of the pharynx and larynx by food.   Accidental inhalation of foreign material is another cause.

When external pressure prevents breathing the term mechanical asphyxia is used. Traumatic asphyxia, positional asphyxia and "riot-crush" deaths are subtypes of mechanical asphyxia.  In traumatic asphyxia, a large mass or heavy weight presses on the victim's chest or upper body preventing breathing.  Survival with minimal or no pathology is surprisingly common even if there is a short loss of consciousness.  More severe cases have included people pinned under a vehicle after a motorway accident or a vehicle falling or rolling onto someone attempting repairs. Traumatic asphyxia has also been reported during police restraint when one or more officers attempt to subdue someone by sitting on their chest. Positional asphyxia is most often an accidental result of someone trapped in a restricted space in a position that prevents breathing. Self-imposed suspended or strapped positions with the head lowered for autoerotic benefits are examples of accidental or suicidal positional asphyxia. Many cases involve alcohol or drug intoxication.    When someone is prevented from breathing or crushed by the bodies of others such as during sports games and rock concerts, the asphyxial death is termed "riot-crush" for obvious reasons. A combination of traumatic asphyxia and smothering can be accidental or homicidal.  The former might involve inadvertently rolling over and incapacitating an infant placed in bed with parents or an older sibling. Burial in a collapsed mine-shaft or cave are other examples. During the early 19th century, "resurrectionists" Burke and Hare excavated graveyard bodies to sell to medical schools.  They decided preying upon alcoholics would make their job easier.  Burke sat on the victim's chest, used one hand to cover their nose and mouth and the other to close their jaws resulting in traumatic asphyxia and a fresh body - without digging.  This is an example of homicidal traumatic asphyxia in combination with smothering now called "Burking".

During deaths by suffocating gases, ambient oxygen is displaced by another gas.   Common examples are carbon dioxide and methane which are found in mines, sewers and natural gas used for cooking. An interesting case that has received media attention recently involves the mass mortality of people living near volcanoes [www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/volcanocity]. Lake Nyos and Lake Kivu formed in craters made by dormant volcanoes in Africa. Fissures or springs beneath the craters feed the lakes and deliver high concentrations of carbon dioxide gas which can flow beneath the ambient air to lower elevations thereby decimating entire villages including thousands of people and animals. The locals call these ground hugging plumes of odorless, volcanic carbon dioxide "mazuku" which means "evil wind". Children are often victims because they breathe air nearest to the surface of the earth.

Tolerance to ischemia and asphyxia vary with not only age and special adaptation but also with past medical history and present state of health.  For example, those who have a history of cardiovascular or pulmonary disease may be more susceptible [e.g. heart attack, asthma]. Medications can also affect the body's ability to defend itself against asphyxial threat. 

Postmortem examinations, review of medical records, accident reports and photos taken at the scene are used to analyze and classify asphyxial deaths.  There are non-specific physical signs used to attribute death to asphyxia.  These include visceral congestion via dilation of the venous blood vessels and blood stasis, petechiae, cyanosis and fluidity of the blood.  Petechiae are tiny hemorrhages. Blood vessels, usually small veins, are broken by high intravascular pressure.  They can occur in various parts of the body such as over the surface of the heart and organs, in the eye, the skin and the scalp.  If a large area is affected they may be termed ecchymoses and appear as bruising.    Hemoglobin [Hb] in red blood cells turns from red to blue when it loses oxygen. Veins are described as blue since they carry blood that has released oxygen to the body’s cells, back to the lungs where it can be reoxygenated. As asphyxia progresses and more oxygen is depleted, a dark discoloration of the skin and tissues called cyanosis develops. Cyanotic tissue is described as blue, black or purplish in color depending upon the percentage of deoxygenated blood. After death, changes in blood chemistry and the breakdown of clotting proteins such as fibrin lower the viscosity of the blood; this is sometimes called 'fluidity'. The study of flow is called rheology thus; those who specialize in the study of blood flow behavior are called rheologists or, more specifically, hemorheologists.

As stated earlier, these physical variables are non-specific to asphyxia meaning they can be present after death from other causes.  Furthermore, a case may be complicated by pathology or injuries additional to asphyxia. This information is used by forensic scientists in combination with data on place and manner of death to perform analyses and form opinions. Investigation into asphyxial death often involves a combination of experts who may be clinicians, biomechanical experts and automotive experts who perform accident reconstruction, and chemical or biological scientists.

Further Reading

Beach, H.H. A. and F. Cobb. 1904. Traumatic Asphyxia. Report of a recent case, with a study of the minute pathology, and summary of reported cases. Annals of Surgery 36(4): 481-494.

Feldman, E.A. 1969. Traumatic Asphyxia. The Journal of Trauma, 9(4): 347-353.

Elsner, R. and B. Gooden. 1983. Diving and asphyxia: A comparative study of animals and man. Monographs of the Physiological Society, No. 40. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 168 pages.

Elsner, R. and L.L. Wickham. 1988. Implications of physiological studies of seals. Marine Mammal Science, 4(1): 34-43.

Wickham, L.L., R.M. Bauersachs, R.B. Wenby, S. Sowemimo-Coker, H.J. Meiselman, and R. Elsner. 1990. Red cell aggregation and viscoelasticity of blood from seals, swine and man. Biorheology, 27: 191-204.

Hambeck, W. and K. Pueschel. 1981. Death by Railway Accident: Incidence of traumatic asphyxia. The Journal of Trauma, 21(1): 28-51.

Copeland, A. R. 1986. Vehicular-related traumatic asphyxial deaths – Caveat Scrutator. Z. Rechtsmed, 96: 17-22.

DiMaio, V.J. and D. DiMaio. 2001. Asphyxia. In Forensic Pathology, 2nd Ed., New York, NY, pp. 229-275.

Adams, V.I. and R.S. Vega. 2004. Suffocation in Motor Vehicle Crashes. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 25(2): 101-107.

Miyashi, S., K. Yoshitome, Y. Yamamoto, T. Naka and H. Ishizu. 2004. Negligent homicide by traumatic asphyxia. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 118: 106-110.

Sauvageau, A. and S. Raclette. 2006. Autoerotic deaths in the literature from 1954 to 2004: A review. Journal of Forensic Science, 51(1): 140-146.


Top of Page

John Fiske Brown Associates, Inc. (2008)